MLM Mind Games: Poor Irrelevant Analogies

MLM distributors quite often make arguments for their products in public forums. Many times they’ll use an analogy or comparison. If only given a quick glance the analogy seems logical. However, when you spend a little more time breaking them down, it becomes clear that they are trying to mislead you. Here are a few of the many poor analogies I’ve seen used over and over again:

Product Pricing Analogies

Many distributors claim that their product is priced competitively when compared to a product at another location. Popular examples include coffee at Starbucks, soda and popcorn at the movies, and beer at a ballgame. In all these cases, it is the location that raises the price of the products. Coffee, soda, popcorn, and beer are generally many, many times cheaper when bought at your grocery store freed from the overhead of locations needing to pay baristas, movie stars, and ballplayers.

Comparison to Other Business Models

Many distributors claim that MLM is similar to other trusted business models. Here are a couple of poor, highly flawed comparisons they make.

  • Real Estate Agents – They make a comparisons to being a real estate agent. I have bought several homes and I know dozens of people who have done the same. At no point did the real estate agent ever try to convince me to become a real estate agent. If he had, he wouldn’t have received bonuses related to my sales. As the FTC says in its guidelines of the MLM and pyramid schemes, the differences rely greatly on how much recruiting is being done and how many sales are made to the public who are NOT distributors.
  • Franchising – Many distributors claim that MLM is just like owning a franchise, similar to McDonalds or a Subway. I have been a customer of McDonalds and Subway many times and never has the owner of the franchise approached me about buying a franchise. Referring to the statement above they do zero recruiting and nearly 100% of sales to people who do own franchises in the same company. Owners of a franchise do not earn on-going commissions or percentages of sales of people they recruit.

Bottom Line: It is clear that the real estate agent and franchise comparisons aren’t accurate. Anyone involved in the MLM industry using it is either trying to swindle you or doesn’t know what they are talking about. In either case, you want to ignore what they say and distance yourself from them and the pitch they are making.

This post involves:

MLM Mind Games

... and focuses on:

, , ,

2 Responses to “MLM Mind Games: Poor Irrelevant Analogies”
  1. Sinaz Says:

    The issue with this article is in the fact that you are denying the validity of the comparison based upon something that isn’t relevant in the comparison.
    They talk about Real estate in terms of sales teams where the broker is allowed to create their own sales team and the commission checks go up the line.

    The comparison to McDonalds had to do with buying a proven system that has been market tested to get results if the training is followed.

    Which are completely relevant comparisons

  2. mlmmyth Says:

    Those parts may be relevant, but neither of them address the pyramid scheme aspects. Real Estate doesn’t have minimum purchases by the sales team where the money goes up the line. Thus we can disregard it as an analogy.

    There are numerous examples of training leading towards positive results. McDonalds is usually used as the franchise model. However, again, franchises make 0% of their money from recruiting so they are obviously not pyramid schemes either.

    It’s as if you are saying that Hitler must have a been a good person, because Mother Teresa was a good person citing that they are both people and thus it is a relevant comparison.


Previous: MLM Scammer Tim Sales on People Failing and Golf
Next: MLM Mind Game: Real Life Experience vs. External Perspective